<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Economist India ads: clever or boring?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bhatnaturally.com/advertising/the-economist-india-ads-clever-or-boring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bhatnaturally.com/advertising/the-economist-india-ads-clever-or-boring/</link>
	<description>Ramblings on Advertising, Apple and New Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:34:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sricharan</title>
		<link>http://www.bhatnaturally.com/advertising/the-economist-india-ads-clever-or-boring/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>sricharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bhatnaturally.com/?p=1431#comment-684</guid>
		<description>i had an argument about the economist ads with my CDs. both of them didn&#039;t understand these ads. and they were arguing about how these are so obscure while the originals like management trainee, age 42 were easy to understand. but i think you nailed it when you made your point about wit and charm. i fully agree with you that while the indian ones may have raised an understanding eyebrow, none of them brought a smile. i only hope that someone at the economist noticed this glaring omission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had an argument about the economist ads with my CDs. both of them didn&#8217;t understand these ads. and they were arguing about how these are so obscure while the originals like management trainee, age 42 were easy to understand. but i think you nailed it when you made your point about wit and charm. i fully agree with you that while the indian ones may have raised an understanding eyebrow, none of them brought a smile. i only hope that someone at the economist noticed this glaring omission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

